​​

👤 CLIENT: I’ve looked at your website. I understand animation—but I’m not clear on why we would hire you as a strategic consultant. Can you explain what you actually do?

​

🧠 LAS: That’s a fair question—and the distinction is important. Leimert Animation Studio designs decision-support systems and uses animation as the medium to make those systems visible, understandable, and actionable. In practical terms: We take complex environments (economic systems, cultural ecosystems, institutional processes) We model how they actually function Then we translate that model into a visual system your team can see, reason about, and make decisions from So the value is not “a video.” The value is clarity that improves decisions.

​​

👤 CLIENT That sounds good in theory—but we already have analysts, reports, and dashboards. Why do we need this?

​​

🧠 LAS: You likely have data and analysis. What you probably don’t have is structural clarity that is shared across decision-makers. Most organizations struggle with:

​

• Fragmented understanding across teams

• Over-reliance on documents that don’t translate into action

• Inability to see how parts of a system interact

 

What we build is: A shared mental model of your system — made visible. When people can see the system, three things happen:

​

1. Decisions become faster

​

2. Alignment improves across stakeholders

​​

3. Strategy becomes grounded in structure, not opinion

​​​

​​​

👤 CLIENT Let’s talk about money. How do you justify your pricing? What’s the ROI? 

​​​

🧠 LAS: We price based on decision impact, not production time. So the question becomes: What is the cost of unclear decisions in your organization? For example:

​

• Delayed initiatives

• Misaligned teams

• Ineffective programs

• Lost opportunities

​

If a clearer system model helps your team:

​

• Avoid one failed initiative

• Align faster across departments Or

• identify a high-impact opportunity

​

the return typically exceeds the engagement cost many times over. We’re not competing with production vendors. We’re closer to strategy consultants—just with a more effective delivery medium.

​​​

👤 CLIENT Okay—so what exactly would you deliver? Walk me through a project.

​​​

🧠 LAS: A typical engagement has three phases:

​​​

1. We work with your team to identify: Key actors Flows (money, people, information) This is where most of the strategic value is created.

​​​

2. System Modeling: We construct a formal model of your system: Relationships between components Feedback loops Points of leverage This becomes the foundation for everything.

​​

3. Visual Translation: We translate that model into: A visual systems diagram A short animation that explains it clearly

 

Optional: internal or external communication assets

​​​

👤CLIENT I worry this might oversimplify things. Our systems are very complex.

​​​

🧠 LAS: That’s exactly why this work is valuable. We don’t simplify by removing complexity. We simplify by structuring it correctly. There’s a difference between:

​

Oversimplification → misleading Structural clarity → usable

​

Our goal is:

​

Preserve complexity, but make it intelligible.

​

If your system cannot be explained clearly, it usually means: It’s not fully understood yet

​

Or it’s not structured optimally

​​​

👤 Have you done this before? Or is this experimental?

​​​

🧠 LAS: The approach draws from established disciplines:

​

• Economic modeling

• Systems thinking

• Decision theory

​

What’s new is how we integrate them into a visual medium. I’m currently applying this framework to a real-world system:

​

a micro-district economic and cultural ecosystem in Los Angeles.

​

That project is helping refine:

​

The modeling approach

The visual grammar

The decision-making applications

​

So while the integration is innovative, the foundations are rigorous.

​​​

👤 How long does this take? We don’t want something that drags on.

​​​

🧠 LAS: We design engagements to be focused and efficient. Typical timeline: 1–2 weeks

​​

Modeling:              1–2 weeks

Visual translation: 1–2 weeks

​​​

So roughly 3–6 weeks total, depending on scope. We avoid open-ended engagements. The goal is clarity delivered quickly.

​​​

👤 CLIENT What if our team doesn’t actually use this?

​​​

🧠 LAS: YOU That’s a critical risk—and we design around it. We ensure adoption by:

​​

    1. Building with your team, not for your team

​​​

    2. Focusing on decisions they already need to make

​​​

3. Delivering outputs that are: Immediately understandable Easy to share Useful in meetings If a model isn’t used, it failed—regardless of how good it looks.

​​

👤 CLIENT:  There are a lot of consultants out there. Why should we choose you?

​​​

🧠 LAS: YOU: Because we solve a problem most consultants don’t address: The gap between understanding and action. Many consultants: Deliver reports Provide recommendations But those often fail because: Stakeholders don’t fully internalize them The system isn’t clearly understood What we do differently: We build the system itself Then make it visually undeniable So instead of telling you what to do… We show you how your system actually works—so the right decisions become obvious.

​​

🔴 OBJECTION 1: “This sounds like animation. Why is this so expensive?”

​​

🧠 LAS: This isn’t priced as animation—it’s priced as decision clarity. Animation is just the medium. What you’re paying for is: Understanding your system Structuring it correctly Making it usable for decision-making If all you needed was animation, you could get that cheaper.

 

But if you need:

 

     Alignment across stakeholders

     Clear understanding of how your system works

     Better decisions

 

That’s a different category of value.

​​

🔴 OBJECTION 2: “We can’t justify this budget right now.”
 

🧠 LAS: Understood. The real question is: What is the cost of

 

     continuing without clarity?

     Misaligned initiatives

     Wasted resources

     Missed opportunities

 

If this work helps you avoid even one misstep, it often pays for itself. If budget is tight, we can scope a smaller entry point—but I wouldn’t recommend doing nothing.

​​

🔴 OBJECTION 3: “We already have consultants.”

​​

🧠 LAS: That’s actually ideal. We don’t replace consultants—we make their work usable.

​​

Most consulting outputs:

​​

     Live in documents

​​​

     a) Are interpreted differently by different stakeholders

​​

     b) We take that complexity and turn it into:

​​

     c) Strategic Consultancy Dialogue

​​

     d) A shared, visual understanding that everyone can act on.

​​

🔴 OBJECTION 4: “This feels abstract.”

​​

🧠 LAS: It only feels abstract until you see your system. Once we map:

         

          Who is involved

          How value flows

          Where constraints exist

​​

it becomes very concrete. Most organizations operate inside systems they’ve never fully visualized. We make that visible.

​​

🔴 OBJECTION 5: “What exactly do we walk away with?”

​​

🧠 LAS: You walk away with three things:

​​

          1. A clear model of your system:

                 

                 How it works

                 Where leverage exists

         

          2. A visual diagram Usable in strategy discussions Aligns your team instantly

          3. A short animation Explains the system clearly: Internally or externally

​​

But the real deliverable is: A shared understanding your team can actually use. 

​​

🔴 OBJECTION 6: “How do we know this will work for us?”

​​

🧠 LAS: We structure engagements to minimize risk:

 

                Tight scope

                Clear phases

                Early visibility into the model

 

You’re not waiting until the end to see value—you see it as we build.

​​

🔴 OBJECTION 7: “This seems too simple for our complexity.”

​​

🧠 LAS: Clarity often looks simple—but it’s hard to achieve. We’re not removing complexity—we’re: Organizing it so it can be understood. If something is too complex to explain clearly, it’s usually not fully understood yet.

​​

🔴 OBJECTION 8: “Can’t we just do this internally?”

​​​

🧠 LAS: You can—but it’s very difficult from the inside. Why?

​

           You’re embedded in the system

           Assumptions go unchallenged

           Blind spots persist.

​

We bring:

​​​

          Structured modeling

          External perspective

          A disciplined process

          Strategic Consultancy Dialogue

​​​

🔴 OBJECTION 9: “What if our team doesn’t use it?”

​​

🧠 LAS: That’s a valid concern. We design for usage by: Involving your team in the process :

 

     Anchoring everything to real decisions

     Delivering something intuitive and usable

 

If it’s not used, it failed—so we build to prevent that.

​​

🔴 OBJECTION 10: “Why should we trust this approach?”

​​

🧠 LAS: The foundations are not experimental:

          Economics

          Systems thinking

          Decision theory

​​

What’s new is the integration and delivery. We’re not inventing theory—we’re improving how it’s applied and understood. 

​

Leimert Animation Studio is your go-to partner for creating impactful explainer videos tailored specifically for nonprofit 
organizations. Nonprofits face numerous challenges to effectively communicate their mission and gain support. Leimert Animation Studio addresses these challenges.

​​

• They also provide regular updates, ensuring that donors remain connected and motivated to continue supporting the nonprofit's cause.

• Last but not least, our explainer videos serve as an accessible resource, guiding the nonprofit's clients through its services and the support available to it. Leimert Animation Studio can create powerful explainer videos that captivate their audience, drive action, and ultimately propel their organization to new heights.

​​

===========================================================================================

Stated differently for the more analytically inclined:

​

Let:

• P = participation in creative process

• S = shared narrative (common frame)

• R = relationships / trust (network density)

• C = collective capacity (coordination ability)

• A = action (mobilization events / measurable partner outcomes)

​

Core claims:

1. P → (S ∧ R)

2. (S ∧ R) → C

3. C → A
   Therefore: P → A

​

SYMBOLIC LOGIC SIMBOLES:​

→, ⇒, ⊃: Conditional (IF...THEN, Implies)

∧ (caret), &, ∙: Conjunction (AND)